A.C.ARUMUGAPERUMAL ADITYAN
Amudha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu rep. by Inspector of Police, Dharmapuri District & Another – Respondent
This revision has been preferred by the wife of the victim viz., Amudha against the Judgment in S.C.No.99 of 2003 on the file of the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri at Krishnagiri.
2.The accused has been charged under Section 302 IPC for having murdered Nagaraj, co-employee of Agricultural Extension Centre (Godown) Marandahalli District, the husband of Amudha, the revision petitioner herein.
3. After the full fledged trial, the case is ended in acquittal. So against the findings of the learned trial Judge, this revision has been preferred by P.W.2, Amudha, the wife of the late Nagaraj.
4. The short facts of the case relevant for the purpose of deciding this revision are as follows:
Both the deceased Nagaraj and the accused Chinnasamy were working in the Agricultural Extension Centre at Marandahalli. The deceased was the Manager of the said office wherein the accused was working as a night watchman. The victim was found dead on 21. 2002 night in a pool of blood in the office. A complaint was preferred by P.W.1 on the basis of which P.W.11, the Sub Inspector of Police had registered the case under Section 302 IPC under Crime No.54 of 2002 at Marandahalli Po
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.