These Revision Petitions have been filed against the order dated 18. 1998 and 10. 2001 made in R.C.A.Nos.12/97 and 10/99, on the file of the Appellate Authority, (Principal Sub-Judge) Mayiladuthurai confirming the orders dated 4. 97 and 8. 99 made in RCOP Nos.10/96 and 32/97 on the file of the rent controller (Principal District Munsif) Mayiladuthurai, respectively.

2. As the parties are one and the same and the property involved in all the revision petitions is the very same property, a common order is being passed to dispose of both the revision petitions.

3. The brief facts are as under:

These revision petitions are filed by the tenant. RCOP No.10/1999 was filed by the respondent herein, hereinafter called the landlord, against the revision petitioner, hereinafter called the tenant, for eviction on the ground of willful default and owners occupation. The case of the landlord in RCOP No.10/1999 is that he purchased the petition property on 23. 1996 from one T.R.Anthonysamy represented by his Power of Attorney. The tenant was already there in the property even before his purchase and therefore he became his tenant after purchase. As he did not pay the rent from 23. 19