SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Mad) 1830

K.N.BASHA
Kailash Chand Jain – Appellant
Versus
N. Seetharaman and others – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate for petitioner.

Judgment :-

1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has come forward in all these Petitions seeking for a direction to set aside the impugned orders passed by the learned Magistrate, dismissed the Complaints filed by the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the complainant in all the Complaints. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in all the Complaints, the date of the disputed cheques and amount borrowed by the accused and also in respect of the presentation, thereafter date of statutory notice given are clearly stated. It is also contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has followed the mandatory requirements contemplated under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. It is further contented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that after recording the sworn statements of the petitioner, the learned Magistrate has dismissed all the Complaints mainly on the ground that the complainant has not given the details about the payment of loan, date of cheque a










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top