K.N.BASHA
Kailash Chand Jain – Appellant
Versus
N. Seetharaman and others – Respondent
1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has come forward in all these Petitions seeking for a direction to set aside the impugned orders passed by the learned Magistrate, dismissed the Complaints filed by the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the complainant in all the Complaints. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in all the Complaints, the date of the disputed cheques and amount borrowed by the accused and also in respect of the presentation, thereafter date of statutory notice given are clearly stated. It is also contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has followed the mandatory requirements contemplated under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. It is further contented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that after recording the sworn statements of the petitioner, the learned Magistrate has dismissed all the Complaints mainly on the ground that the complainant has not given the details about the payment of loan, date of cheque a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.