SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Mad) 1546

S.ASHOK KUMAR
N. Yonus Sait – Appellant
Versus
T. Joseph & Another – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:R. Thiagarajan, Advocate. For the Respondents:
A. Bobblie, Advocate.

Judgment :-

The above revisions are filed against the order dismissing the revision petitioner/plaintiffs applications in I.A.Nos.I.A.Nos. 665 and 667 of 2006 in O.S.Nos.169 and 170 of 2006 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Uthagamandalam, filed by him for grant of interim injunction restraining the respondents/defendants from putting up any illegal and unauthorised construction on his property.

.2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:-

.The revision petitioner Yunus Sait is the owner of the residential cum non-residential premises of the schedule mentioned suit property, which is known as Adama Buildings. He filed two suits one against T.Joseph in O.S.No:169 of 2006 and another in O.S.No:170 of 2006 as against one Narayana Das Samtani. Both of them are admittedly the tenants of the buildings, which consists of ground and first floor. It is also the admitted case of the parties that premises was rented out for residential as well as commercial purposes. It is also not in dispute that there was a fire accident and according to the revision petitioner/plaintiff, the petition premises was entirely burnt and destroyed in the said fire accident. According to him, the r









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top