SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Mad) 1921

M.CHOCKALINGAM
Sakunthala Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Shri Chandrasekara Achari – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:G. Prem Anand Rao, Advocate. For the Respondent: ---

Judgment :-

Challenging the judgment of the Division Bench of Small Causes Court, Chennai made in NTA No.5 of 1999, the defendant/revision petitioner has brought forth this revision petition.

2.The respondent Shri Chandrasekara Achari Estate, represented by its Executive Officer, has filed original suit on the file of the Small Causes Court, Chennai, seeking ejectment of the revision petitioner that she was the tenant in respect of the premises belonged to the trust, which was subsequently merged with Angala Parameswari and Kasi Viswanatha Swami Temple; that she was paying rental; that there was rental balance for 18 months at the rate of Rs.65/-; that a notice was issued on 18. 1994 calling upon her to vacate and hand over the possession on or before 30.09.1994, but not done so and hence, the suit. It was resisted by the defendant/revision petitioner, stating that it is true, rental rate was Rs.65/-and she has been making payment without any default; that since she was not doing well, she could not pay; that further she has paid the total rental balance in July, 1997 and there was no rental balance at all; that the tenancy was not terminated properly as contemplated in law and unde


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top