SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Mad) 2327

V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
J. Selvan – Appellant
Versus
N. Punidha – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Uma Ramanathan, Advocate. For the Respondent:Nalini Chidambaram, Advocate.

Judgment :

V. Ramasubramanian, J.

This is a petition filed under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, by the father of two minor children by name S. Kishore Kumar and S. Praveen Kumar. The mother of the minor children is the respondent herein.

2. The petitioner took out an application in A. No. 1858 of 2006 for interim custody of the minor children, for the vacation in May 2006, on the ground that the orders passed in earlier applications for visitation rights and for interim custody in A.No.4773 of 2003 and A.No.4641 of 2005 were actually frustrated. In the said application A.No.1858 of 2006. I passed an interim order, permitting the petitioner to take interim custody of the minor children on 20.4.2007 and return the children on 24. 2007. On the ground that the said order was disobeyed, the petitioner took out a contempt petition in Contempt Petition No.447 of 2007.

3. However, upon finding that both parties have already adduced evidence and the Original Petition itself was ripe for final disposal, I directed the learned counsel appearing for both sides to file written arguments, so that the Original Petition itself could be disposed of. Accordingly, Ms. lima Ramanatha










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top