A.C.ARUMUGAPERUMAL ADITYAN
Philip Antony – Appellant
Versus
Raichal Jayamani & Others – Respondent
The revision petitioner is the respondent in M.C.No.24 of 1990 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Tambaram which was filed under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. by the respondents herein (wife and the children of revision petitioner herein).
2. As per the order in M.C.No.24 of 1990,the petitioners in M.C.No.24 of 1990 /respondents herein were awarded maintenance at the following rates. The first petitioner/first respondent was awarded Rs.300/- per mensum towards maintenance and other two minor petitioners /respondents 2 and 3 herein were awarded Rs.250/- per mensum each towards maintenance. Subsequently for enhancement of the said maintenance amount ordered by the learned Trial Judge, the respondent’s herein/petitioners in M.C.No.24 of 1990 have filed Crl.M.P.No.478 of 2003 in M.C.No.24 of 1990 under Section 127 of Cr.P.C. with a prayer to enhance the maintenance amount to Rs.500/- each. The learned trial Judge, after giving due considerations from the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondent has allowed the petition as prayed for, taking into consideration, the cost of living and also
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.