The revision petitioner and appellant in all the three cases are one and the same, namely ICICI Bank Ltd., Both the CRPs have been preferred by the ICICI Bank Ltd against the orders passed in I.A.Nos:17604 and 19512 of 2002 in I.A.No:12477 of 2001 in O.S.No:4406 of 2001 passed by the learned III Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, setting aside the ex parte order of attachment before judgement made in I.A.No:12477 of 2001 dated 211. 2001 and dismissing the I.A.,preferred by the ICICI Bank Ltd., to direct the second respondent-Garnishee, Indian Bank to deposit the decree amount into court.

2. The CMSA has been preferred by the ICICI Bank Ltd., as against the judgement and decree of the first appellate court passed in A.S.No:431 of 2005 whereby the learned VII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, set aside the order of the trial court made in E.P.No:313 of 2005, directing the garnishee-Indian Bank to deposit the amount attached in I.A.No:12477/2001.

.3. The brief facts of the cases are as follows:

.The revision petitioner-ICICI Bank Ltd., filed the suit O.S.No:4406 of 2001 as against the second respondent-Indian Bank for recovery of a sum of Rs.2,57,063/= with in