G.RAJASURIA
Vijayakanth – Appellant
Versus
P. Mariammal – Respondent
This petition has been filed to call for the records in C.C.No.207 of 2006 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Srivilliputtur and quash the same.
2. Heard both sides.
.3. The facts giving rise to the filing of this petition as stood exposited from the records could be portrayed and parodied thus:
.The case in C.C.No.207 of 2006 emerged on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Srivilliputtur, consequent upon the complaint lodged by Mariammal, the respondent/complainant through his power agent for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 read with Section 34 I.P.C as against A.1, L.K.Sudeesh and A.2, Vijayakanth, the petitioner herein.
.4. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with, the method and manner in which cognizance has been taken, the petitioner/A.2 has filed this petition on the main ground that he had nothing to do with the alleged contract or promise which allegedly emerged between A.1 and the complainant concerned; the Central Board of Film Certificate relating to the film "Narasimma would demonstrate that the applicant for obtaining such certificates, was one Ms.Captain Cine Creations and the Producer was L.K.Sudeesh; t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.