SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Mad) 3245

M.CHOCKALINGAM
P. Rajagurusamy – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Registrar Office & Others – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:V.R. Karthikeyan, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 – R3 V. Arun Additional Government Pleader.

Judgment :-

Invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court, the petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to quash the registration of the cancellation of the document No.2747 of 2005 dated 28. 2005 executed by the respondents 4 to 9 in favour of the petitioner and four others on 13. 2005 bearing Document No.1456 of 2005 at the office of the first respondent herein.

2. The affidavit in support of the petition is perused. The Court heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 1 to 3.

3. The case of the petitioner who seeks the writ, is that he along with four others entered into an agreement for purchase of the undivided share having an extent of 2.50 acres in Old Patta No.7, Alandur Zamin, comprised in Survey Nos.5/1, 10/1, 17/1, 18/1, 19/1, 13/1, 14/1, 45/1, 48/1, 89, 91, 93/2, 22, 23/1, 24/1, 25/1, 26, 30/1, 37, 47/1, 61/1, 90, 92/2 and 94/2, Saidapet Taluk, from one R.Vasantha and five others for a valuable consideration on 13. 2005; that in order to verify the veracity of the vendors statement, they sought for certified copies of the two settlement deeds; that they satisfied with the same; that they also sought fo








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top