K.MOHAN RAM
Nataraj @ T. Natarajan – Appellant
Versus
P. Venkatachalam – Respondent
1. The above Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner to call for the records comprised in C.C. No.1295 of 2006 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Erode and to quash the same.
2. Though the respondent, had been served and his name shown in the cause title, he is neither appearing in person nor through counsel and hence in his absence the Petition is being taken up for final disposal.
3. The brief facts that are necessary for the disposal of the above Criminal Original Petition are set-out here-under:
Since the cheque issued by the petitioner to the respondent herein was returned/unpaid the respondent issued a statutory notice on 7. 2006, which was served on the petitioner on 17. 2006. The lest date for filing a Complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") was 28. 2006, but admittedly the Complaint came to be filed only on 9. 2006 i.e., after the delay of 10 days. But the complaint was not accompanied with any Petition to condone the said delay of 10 days, but yet the learned Magistrate had taken cognizance of the case as
C.C. No.1295 of 2006 and had ordered issue of process to the acc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.