K.MOHAN RAM
T. L. Vedachalam – Appellant
Versus
The State rep. by The Inspector of Police SPE/CBI/ACB/Chennai – Respondent
The petitioner in the above criminal original petitions is the first accused in C.C.Nos.23 and 22 of 2004 on the file of the Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, Chennai.
2. Both the above said cases, the petitioner is facing trail for charges under Sections 120-B r/w 420, 468, 468 r/w 471 IPC and Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The above petitions have been filed seeking to quash all further proceedings in the said cases on identical grounds.
3. Heard Mr.V. Ramana Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.Chandrasekaran, learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI Cases appearing for the respondent.
.4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the averments in the First Information Report on the face of it would not constitute any offences as against the petitioner herein; the charge sheets and the statements relied on for the same are also inherently defective in particulars and there are no nexus between the actual procedures of process of settlement of claim and the charges framed against the petitioner and as such the criminal proceedings are liable to be quashed; there were no bogus motor claims;
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.