SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Mad) 3606

A.KULASEKARAN
V. Shanmugam – Appellant
Versus
S. Umamaheswaran – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:A.K. Kumarasamy, Advocate. For the Respondent: ---

Judgment :-

This revision petition is listed today for admission and I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The first defendant in O.S. No. 27 of 2004 on the file of Principal District Judge, Erode is the revision petitioner herein. The respondent herein has filed the said suit for setting aside the sale deed dated 110. 1998, executed in favour of the petitioner herein pertaining to A-Schedule property and the sale deed dated 010. 1998 executed in favour of the 4th defendant pertaining to item 1 of B Schedule property and the sale deed dated 110. 1998 in favour of the 4th defendant in respect of item No.2 of the B Schedule Property and for damages.

3. On earlier occasion, this Court, while disposing of the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, directed the trial court to dispose of the suit within a period of six months. The respondent herein had examined six witnesses on his side including PW6, who is the Bank Official. The petitioner herein has filed I.A. Nos. 770 and 771 of 2007 for reopening PW6s evidence and recall PW6 respectively for cross-examination by the petitioner and the said IAs were dismissed by the order dated 28.09.2006, which is challenged in these civil revis








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top