R.MALA
M. Kuppusamy Naicker – Appellant
Versus
M. Mani & Others – Respondent
The Suit has been filed praying for grant of Letters of Administration with the will annexed to the Plaintiff as the beneficiary under the Last Will and Testament of the deceased having effect throughout the State of Tamilnadu.
2. The averments made in the plaint are as follows-
(i) It is submitted that one Annammal, wife of Seetharama Naicker, was died on 27. 1991. At the time of her death, she left a property within the state of Tamilnadu . She resided at No.9, Othavadai Street, Nesapakkam, Chennai-78. When she executed a Will on 25. 1990, it was registered as the last will and testament of the deceased. It is duly executed that the deceased has not appointed any executor to execute the will and the Plaintiff being the sole beneficiary since the said deceased had no issues and her husband Seetharama Naicker also predeceased her at the time of executing the said Will. The testatrix of the said will died on 27. 1991. Since the plaintiff was not aware that he should obtain grant of letters of administration for the will, hence he did not approach the court. So the said delay is neither willful nor wanton.
(ii) The plaintiff is the sole surviving heir according to Indian
4. Janaki Devi v. R.Vasanthi 2005 (1) CTC 11
7. H.Venkatachala Iyengar v. B.N.Thimmajamma
13. Madhukar D.Shende v. Tarabai Shedage
17. Smt.Guro v. Atma Singh & Ors.
5. T.Kanniah Rao v. Inder Rao 1996 (II) CTC 466
8. Selvi v. Gomathy Ammal 2009(1) CTC 541
12. Gurdial Kaur and Ors. v. Kartar Kaur & Ors.
21. Janki Narayan Bhoir v. Narayan Namdeo Kadam
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.