K.MOHAN RAM
P. Ramankutty Menon & Another – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, Tiruvottiyur Municipality – Respondent
The respective unsuccessful plaintiffs in O.S.Nos.137 and 41 of 2002 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvottiyur, who also lost in A.S.Nos.53 and 51 of 2006 on the file of the Fast Track Court No.IV and Additional District Court, Ponneri, are the appellants in S.A.Nos.449 and 626 of 2009 respectively.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking in the suit.
3. The plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No.137 of 2002 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvottiyur, for a decree declaring that the enhancement of property tax in pursuance of the special notice dated 30.09.1999 is arbitrary, illegal and unjustified and for a consequential permanent injunction restraining the defendants from taking any coercive steps to collect the enhanced tax. The plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No.41 of 2002 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruvottiyur, for a decree declaring the demand of property taxes under demand notices dated 30.09.1999 bearing the Nos.25538, 25535, 25536, 36437, 25539, 25540 and 36396 with respect to the property described in the schedule are illeg
3. Sree Murugan Engg. Products v. C.T.O. (2006) 148 STC 419 (Mad)
4. Harbanslal Sahnia v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (2003) 2 SCC 107
8. M.L.Krishnamoorthy v. Govt. of T.N. (2008) 1 MLJ 111
5. Dhulabhai v. State of M.P. AIR 1969 Supreme Court 78 (1)
9. State of West Bengal v. Subhash Chandra Pratihar AIR 2003 Supreme Court 3182
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.