The petitioner, who has been arrayed as A-14 out of 30 accused in this case, apprehends arrest on the basis of the issue of Non-Bailable Warrant issued against him after filing charge sheet in this case in P.R.C.No.28 of 2009 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Perundurai, for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 148, 448, 452, 365, 354, 386, 395, 427, 506 (ii) and 120(b) IPC and under Sections 3 and 4 of the Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992.

1. Mr.N.Jothi, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been implicated on the allegation of conspiracy and his name was not mentioned in the First Information Report (F.I.R.) which was sent through post and registered in Crime No.650 of 2008. It is contended that there are only general allegations made against the petitioner to the effect that the petitioner received phone calls from some of the assailants. It is further submitted that the further allegation is to the effect that three named persons in the F.I.R. alleged to have asked the complainant to come for a settlement talks before the petitioner, but the complainant refused to attend the sai