SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Mad) 3535

ARUNA JAGADEESAN
Palani – Appellant
Versus
B. Shanthilal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:P. Ganesan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:N.S. Sivakumar, Advocate.

Judgment :-

This Criminal Original Petition is filed by the petitioner/accused to quash the proceedings in CC.No.12687/2004 on the file of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate VIII, George Town, Chennai.

2. The brief facts, which are essential for the disposal of this Criminal Original Petition, are as follows:-

The petitioner/accused has borrowed a loan of Rs.5 lakhs and executed a promissory note in favour of the respondent/complainant on 4. 2003 and on repeated request made by the respondent for repayment of the loan amount with interest, the petitioner had issued a cheque bearing NO.583197 dated 10. 2004 for a sum of Rs.6,80,000/-drawn on State Bank of India, Elephant Gate Branch, Chennai on 10. 2004. When the said cheque was presented for encashment, the same was returned on 10. 2004 with an endorsement “account closed”. The respondent issued a statutory notice dated 10. 2004 to the petitioner and the petitioner/accused received the said notice on 110. 2004, but neither paid the cheque amount within the stipulated period nor sent any reply. Hence, the complaint has been filed by the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

3. According to the petitioner, he














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top