Heard both sides.

2. The petitioner has come forward to challenge the order of the third respondent, i.e. The Public Information Officer-cum-Superintendent of Post Offices, Gudur Division, State of Andhrapradesh, challenging the order, dated 15. 2008 which was confirmed by the second respondent vide his order, dated 7. 2008 and the first respondents order dated 5. 2009. After setting aside those orders the petitioner wanted the information sought in his application, dated 13. 2008 under Section 6 of the Right To Information Act (for short RTI Act).

3. In his representation, dated 13. 2008, the petitioner sought for an information relating to one K.Ramachandra Rao, a retired time-scale Sub-Post Master, who was drawing his pension from Gudur Head Post Office, Nellore District. In the residential address of the said person given in the official document, i.e. No.4/7/156, Nelcost Road, Gudur, Nellore District, State of Andhrapradesh, he was not available. The reason why the petitioner wanted to know his address was that the petitioner had secured a judgment and decree against him before the VII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai in O.S.No.764 of 1997, dated 112. 1998. The