K.CHANDRU
The Management Rep. by its Special Officer, Thiruvannamalai District – Appellant
Versus
R. Palani & Another – Respondent
Heard both sides.
2. The writ petitioner is a Co-operative Society. In the present writ petition, they are challenging the award made in I.D.No.253 of 2003 dated 27. 2004 passed by the 2nd respondent Labour Court, Vellore.
.3. The Writ Petition itself came to be filed only after the 1st respondent moved this Court in W.P.No.5796/2005 seeking for a direction to dispose of his representation dated 12. 2004 regarding his reinstatement. In the representation, he had referred to the dispute raised by him and the consequential award passed by the Labour Court in his favour. The said writ petition came to be disposed of on 22. 2005 with a direction to the 1st respondent to make a fresh representation upon which the writ petitioner was directed to pass appropriate orders. Thereafter, the petitioner seems to have filed a copy application before the 2nd respondent Labour Court in C.A.206/2005. After obtaining an award copy on 27. 2005, the present writ petition came to be filed.
4. The ground raised by the petitioner was that the 1st respondent do not come with the cadre strength and not covered by G.O.Ms.No.86, Co-operative Food and Consumer Protection Department, dated 13. 2001
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.