SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Mad) 4578

M.VENUGOPAL
V. Palani – Appellant
Versus
P. Balasubramaniam – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:G.R. Lakshmanan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:B. Nedunchezhian, Advocate.

Judgment

The Civil Revision Petitioner/Plaintiff/Appellant has preferred this Civil Revision petition against the order dated 20.07.2009 made in I.A.No.56 of 2008 in A.S.No.105 of 2006 by the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu in dismissing the application filed by the Revision Petitioner/Appellant under Rule 74 (2) of the Civil Rules of Practice read with Section 151 C.P.C praying for issuance of subpoena to the learned Additional Subordinate Judges Courts office at Chengalpattu to produce all connected papers and records pertaining to E.P.No.95 of 2001 in O.S.No.5677 of 1996 on the file of VI Assistant City Civil Court, Madras.

2. The first appellate Court, namely, learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Chengalpet while passing orders in I.A.No.56 of 2009 has opined that the present Interlocutory application has been filed with a view to extend the pending appeal proceedings and further that before the trial Court Ex.B.8 has already been marked and further that witnesses have been examined, and when objection has not been raised in regard to Ex.B.8 before the trial Court and added further there is possibility of obtaining certified copies and when the appeal has b













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top