1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the Order dated 14. 2005 made in O.S.No.13 of 2004 on the file of the District Judge, Perambalur.

2. The plaintiffs in O.S.No.13 of 2004 are the revision petitioner herein.

3. O.S.No.13 of 2004 has been filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants/respondents herein for passing a preliminary decree declaring that the plaintiffs are entitled to 5/6th share in ‘B’ and ‘C’ schedule properties, then pass a final decree directing division of ‘A’, ‘B’ and ‘C’ schedule properties, by metes and bounds and allot separate properties for the plaintiffs 5/6th share in ‘A’ schedule and 5/18th share in ‘B’ and ‘C’ schedule properties and for rendition of accounts. Written statement was filed by the first defendant as the first defendant was sole and exclusive owner of the properties described in Plaint ‘A’ and ‘C’ schedule properties. Further, it was a case of the first defendant that he only purchased this properties with his own funds. Thus, the Suit was hotly contested. During the trial of the Suit, a document styled as memo of partial Partition in the Hindu undivided family of J. Ramu Chettiyar, Ariyalur dated 33. 1973 was sought