SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Mad) 5495

R.BANUMATHI
Munusamy – Appellant
Versus
Neethirajan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:S. Sounthar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:N.A. Nissar Ahamed, Advocate.

Judgment

Being aggrieved by judgment in A.S.No.139 of 2004 reversing judgment of the trial Court and thereby decreeing plaintiffs suit for recovery of possession, unsuccessful defendant has filed this Second Appeal.

2. Suit property relates to 4 ½ cents out of 22 cents in S.No.74/13A in Arugur Village, Nemmely. Plaintiff claims that suit property was assigned to him under assignment deed (dt.012. 1983) under Land Ceiling proceedings. Defendant is on the eastern side of the suit property. Case of plaintiff is that when plaintiff was absent from the village on 10.02.1998, defendant committed trespass during plaintiffs absence. After approaching local panchayat, plaintiff filed suit on 30.07.1998 for delivery of possession.

3. Appellant/defendant resisted the suit and filed written statement denying title of the respondent/plaintiff. Defendant has denied having trespassed into the suit property and claimed that defendant is in possession of the suit property for more than 60 years and prayed for dismissal of suit.

4. On the above pleadings three issues were framed. To substantiate plaintiffs case, plaintiff examined himself as PW1. Kist receipt paid by plaintiff was marked as Ex.A1






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top