The proceedings of the respondent in Na.Ka.A3/4397/2006, dated 112. 2006 cancelling the work order as well as the registration are under challenge in this Writ Petition.

.2. The case of the petitioner is that she is a registered panchayat union contractor. She has done substantial work for the local body and semi government organisation. Under the Parliament member constituency development scheme, the petitioner was allotted the construction work of school building by the respondent. The estimate for the construction work is around Rs.3.75 lakhs. The respondent panchayat Union dragged the execution of the agreement as a result of which the petitioner was not able to carry on the work. In the meanwhile, the respondent panchayat on 12. 2006 issued a notice calling upon the petitioner to finish the project. The petitioner submitted her reply to the notice explaining the reasons for the delay in taking up the project. While so, the respondent straightaway passed the impugned order dated 112. 2006 cancelling the work allotted to the petitioner as well as removing the name of the petitioner from the Register of contractors. Aggrieved by such removal of her name from the Registe