B. Rajendran, J.

Second Appeal Nos. 1003 and 1004 of 2008 arise out of the Judgment and Decree made in C.M.A. (L.A.) Nos. 1 and 2 of 2002 dated 08.03.2004 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Krishnagiri.

2. CRP Nos. 1766 and 1974 of 2008 arise out of the order dated 23.04.2008 made in REP No. 73 and 74 of 2005 in CMA Nos. 1 and 2 of 2002 on the file of Sub Court, Krishnagiri.

3. Writ Petition Nos. 12424 and 14814 of 2008 have been filed challenging the orders passed by the Government on 03.04.2008 and 06.06.2008 withdrawing the very acquisition proceeding itself.

4. Since all the matters are inter-connected and relate to the very same acquisition proceedings, by consent of both sides, all the cases are taken up together and disposed of by this common judgment.

5. We have heard the counsel for both sides and perused the material records placed. At the outset, the learned counsel for both sides fairly submitted that subsequent to the filing of the Writ Petitions, the Government passed G.O. (3P) No.15 dated 01.09.2009 cancelling the earlier two Government Orders dated 03.04.2008 and 06.06.2008, which are challenged in the above writ petitions. Therefore, the relief sou