The petitioner is tenant under the respondent in the disputed premises. The respondent filed R.C.O.P.No.1668 of 2007 on the file of XV Small Causes Judge, Chennai. During the enquiry while the landlord was examined, Ex.P.10 and 11 were marked which are the receipt issued by Municipality and rental receipts respectively. The petitioner filed an application before the Rent Controller under Rule 11 of The Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1960, to demark and reject Ex.P.10 and Ex.P.11 and the petition was resisted by the landlord. Ultimately, the learned Rent Controller dismissed the application.

2. In the affidavit, the petitioner has stated that Ex.P.10 and Ex.P.11 were not at all pleaded in the petition which are irrelevant and inadmissible documents and that Ex.P.11 is self-made document which does not bear any acknowledgement and hence both of them have to be eschewed by Court.

3. In the Counter filed by the landlord, the abovesaid allegations have been denied and further stated that only to gain time and drag on matter the petition has been filed and that the contentions do not bear any merits.

4. The learned Rent Controller dismissed the applicatio