Animadverting upon the order dated 110. 2007 passed by the learned Family Court Judge, Pondicherry, in I.A.No.418 of 2004 in O.S.No.157 of 2004, this civil revision petition is focussed.

2. Heard both sides.

3. A summation and summarisation of the relevant facts which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this revision petition would run thus:

The husband, namely P.Bakthavachalam filed the suit O.S.No.157 of 2003 as against his wife/first defendant B.Mohanasundari and three others. In addition to praying for various other reliefs, the plaintiff also has prayed for the relief of declaring that the Settlement Deed dated 24.07.2003 is null and void. The first defendant after entering appearance filed an I.A.No.418 of 2004 under Section 11(2) of the Pondicherry Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act, 1972 praying the Court to decide on the valuation and the adequacy of Court fee paid, whereupon the Court rendered its verdict on 110. 2007 to the effect that the Court fee should have been paid on the market value of the property referred to in the impugned settlement deed and not notionally in a sum of Rs.15,000/-by invoking Section 25(d) of the said Act. Animad