G.RAJASURIA
Tajdeen – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Muthalif – Respondent
1. Anim –adverting upon the memo order dated 18. 2008 passed in I.A. No. 3835 of 2007 in O.S. No. 1081 of 2004 by the principal District Munsif Kallakurichi, this civil revision petition is filed.
2. The facts giving rise to the filing of this civil revision petition, as stood exposited from the records, succinctly and precisely, pithily and briefly could be portrayed thus;
The revision petitioner as plaintiff, filed the suit O.S. No. 1081 of 2004 for injunction as against the defendants, Where upon D2 filed the written statement, issues were framed and the plaintiff also adduced evidence and closed his side, When the matter was posted for defendant’s evidence, the defendant also filed chief examination affidavit, However, thereafter I.A. No. 3835 of 2007 was filed in the said O.S. for filing additional written statement under Order 8 Rule 9. The trial Court allowed the said I.A. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the said order, this revision has been focused on various grounds.
3. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner/plaintiff, by placing reliance on the grounds of revision, would develop his argument to the effect that he would be the last person to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.