P.JYOTHIMANI
V. S. O. Balakrishnan & Others – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector Thiruvallur District & Others – Respondent
Common Order:
In all these cases, by the respective orders, the District Collector directed the petitioners concerned to remit amounts levied towards the silica sand and granite blocks allegedly quarried from lease hold as well as non-leasehold areas with further direction that the non-compliance of the said direction would attract the proceedings under the Revenue Recovery Act to realise the above said amounts. Out of these writ petitions, W.P. (MD) Nos.7324 and 7325 of 2006 are relating to granite quarry at Madurai District, while W.P.No.26650 of 2005 relates to silica sand quarry at Gummidipoondi area.
2. The impugned orders proceeded on the basis that while the writ petitioner in W.P.No.26650 of 2005 was granted lease to quarry silica sand over an extent of 28. 5 hectares in respect of survey Nos.84/2, 85 and 88 (patta lands) in Elavur village, Gummidipoondi taluk for a period of 20 years viz., 6. 1997 to 6. 2017, during the course of inspection it was found that the lessee indulged in illicit mining of silica sand in survey Nos.77/1A, 77/2, 77/3 and 77/4 of Elavur village, for which permission was not granted. In respect of the said writ petitioner, the total amount
5. Harbanslal Sahnia v. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. (2003 (2) SCC 107)
1. Mintu Bhakta vs. The State of West Bengal (1973 (4) SCC 85)
4. State Bank of India vs. Allied Chemical Laboratories and another (2006 (9) SCC 252
6. Whirlpool Corporation. v. Registrar of Trade Marks (1998 (8) SCC 1)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.