SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Mad) 405

S.PALANIVELU
Udhayabhanu – Appellant
Versus
Ranganayaki & Another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Veerakathiravan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Rajaraman, Advocate.

Judgment :-

The Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the fair and final order passed in H.A.M.O.P.No.443 of 2005, dated 26.09.2005, on the file of the Family Court, Coimbatore and to allow the above Civil Revision Petition.

2. The following are the allegations in brief found in the petition filed by the 2nd respondent:

Both the petitioners are husband and wife. Their marriage was held on 25.08.1952. They had no children. The Respondent is the sisters husband of the 2nd petitioner. His wife is Pushpavalli. Their marriage took place in 1968. They have three daughters. Among them, the first daughter is one Vijaya. She was born on 13.03.1970. The 2nd and 3rd children Maheswari and Sarada are living with their parents. Pushpavalli died on 29. 1994. The petitioners decided to adopt the said Vijaya for which the respondent agreed. On 7. 1970, the adoption took place. It was not for any consideration. The petitioners got the capacity to take Vijaya in adoption and in turn, she was also capable of being taken to adoption. The parties are Hindus. The custom and usage furnished in the petitioners to take the child in adoption. The adoptive parents do not have any progenies. As p





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top