SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Mad) 597

G.RAJASURIA
Jyothiammal – Appellant
Versus
Jayapal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: -----.
For the Respondent:D. Ravi, M. Thamizhvel, Advocate.

Judgment :

These civil revision petitions are filed against the orders dated 14. 2005 and 3. 2006 passed in I.A.Nos.962 of 2005 and 962 of 2004, respectively, in O.S.No.130 of 2004 by the District Munsif, Nagapattinam.

Common Order Inveighing the orders dated 14. 2005 and 3. 2006 passed in I.A.Nos.962 of 2005 and 962 of 2004, respectively, in O.S.No.130 of 2004 by the District Munsif, Nagapattinam, these civil revision petitions are focussed.

2. A resume of facts, which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of these civil revision petitions, would run thus:-

O.S.No.130 of 2002 was filed by Jothi Ammal, the petitioner in C.R.P.No.1079 of 2005 and respondent in C.R.P.No.882 of 2006 as against the respondent Jayapal in C.R.P.No.1079 of 2005 and petitioner in C.R.P.No.882 of 2006 seeking the following reliefs:

Tamil

During the pendency of the said suit, an Advocate Commissioner was got appointed for visiting the suit property and measuring the same with the help of a Surveyor. It appears, the Commissioner also visited the suit property, measured it and submitted his report. Being disconcerted and aggrieved by the Commissioners report and sketch, the defendant Jayapal fil

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top