Inveighing the order dated 14.08.2007 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Udumalpet in I.A.No.95 of 2007 in HMOP No.38 of 2006, this civil revision petition is focussed.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Despite notice, none appeared on behalf of the respondent.

3. A summarization and summation of the facts, which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this civil revision petition would run thus:

The respondent/husband herein filed HMOP No.38 of 2006 seeking divorce under Section 13(1) (1)(A) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. During the pendency of the said HMOP, the wife/revision petitioner herein filed I.A.No.95 of 2007 under Section 24 of the Act seeking interim maintenance in a sum of Rs.3,000/-per month and she also prayed for awarding a sum of Rs.20,000/-towards cost of litigation. The lower Court after hearing both sides awarded interim maintenance in a sum of Rs.250/- per month payable by the husband to the wife and the prayer for cost was dismissed. Challenging the said order of the lower Court, this revision is focussed on various grounds.

4. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner placing reliance on the grounds of re