A.C.ARUMUGAPERUMAL ADITYAN
S. Palanisami Gounder – Appellant
Versus
K. Balasubramaniam – Respondent
This revision has been directed against the order passed in I.A.No.1675 of 2008 in O.S.No.179 of 2007 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Coimbatore. The said application was filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 174 days in filing the petition to set aside the exparte decree dated 10. 2007.
2. According to the revision petitioner, since he was suffering from Jaundice for about nine months and was very sick due to his advanced age of 70, he could not move out of his house and could not also come to Coimbatore and to meet his counsel to file his written statement which resulted in an exparte decree against him. The respondent/plaintiff has filed a counter denying the averments in the affidavit filed by the revision petitioner/defendant. After going through the rival contentions of the parties, the learned trial Judge has come to a conclusion that the reasoning stated in the affidavit to condone the delay of 174 days is not reasonable, had dismissed the same. Aggrieved by the findings of the learned trial Judge, the defendant had preferred this revision.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent would rely on a decisi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.