P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
F. Parveen – Appellant
Versus
T. D. Naidu & Another – Respondent
1. This Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 378 of Criminal Procedure Code as against the order dated 24.05.2002 made in C.C.No.8406/2000 on the file of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore to set aside the same.
As against the judgment of acquittal dated 24.05.2002 pronounced by the learned X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai in C.C.No.8406/2000, the defacto complainant who was also examined as PW-1, has preferred this criminal appeal under Section 378 Cr.P.C.
2. The factual matrix leading to the filing of the criminal appeal can be briefly stated as follows:
i) The Inspector of Police, Law and Order, Thirumangalam Police Station, Chennai 600 101, who figures as the second respondent in this appeal registered a case against the first respondent herein/accused based on the complaint of the appellant herein (defacto complainant) dated 010. 1999, in Crime No.1263/1999 for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 506(ii) IPC on the file of Thirumangalam Police Station, Chennai-101.
ii) In the said complaint it had been stated that PW-2 -Senthil, had entrusted a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- to the appellant (PW-1) on 20.07.1999 to keep it in safe custody for a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.