S.TAMILVANAN
J. M. Arumugam & Another – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Salem & Others – Respondent
1. In all these criminal miscellaneous petitions in the unnumbered criminal revision petitions, the question of law involved is one and the same, hence, all the petitions were heard together and common order is being passed.
2. The petitions have been filed by the third parties in M.P. No. 1 of 2008 in Crl. R.C. SR. No. 13036 of 2008, M.P. No. 1 of 2008 in Crl. R.C. SR. No. 13038 of 2008, M.P. No. 1 of 2008 in Crl. R.C. SR. No. 13040 of 2008, M.P. No. 1 of 2008 in Crl. R.C. SR. No. 13042 of 2008, M.P. No. 1 of 2008 in Crl. R.C. SR. No. 13044 of 2008 and M.P. No. 1 of 2008 in Crl. R.C. SR. No. 48000 of 2008 under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal procedure, seeking an order to accept the cause title of the petitioners, whereby permitting the third parties, to maintain criminal revision petitions against the order of discharge passed by the Court below.
3. According to the petitioners, they have filed the unnumbered criminal revision petitions against the impugned orders passed by the Court below and in the respective criminal miscellaneous petitions, they have sought orders to accept the cause title, substituting their names as petitioners, though they were third parties t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.