D. Murugesan, J.

The question raised in this writ petition is as to whether the first respondent C.M.D.A could insist for registered power of attorney when an application is filed through a power of attorney seeking for regularisation of the building plan or not ?

2. The petitioners 1 to 5 are holders of power of attorney and petitioners 6 to 25 are represented through Power of Attorney viz., the petitioners 1 to 5. The issue relates to the construction of building in Door No.18/4, New Mahabalipuram Main road, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai 41. A planning permission was obtained from C.M.D.A on 9. 1993 for construction of building. There were some deviations in the constructions. Hence a regularisation application was made on 310. 2000 by one of the occupants. That application came to be rejected by the respondents in their order dated 18. 2002 on the ground that the applicant should submit 5 sets of revised plan ; attested copy of the earlier approved plan ; ownership documents, NOC from the Director of Fire Service and the Original copy of the receipt dated 312. 2000. The deficiencies were rectified and the application was resubmitted. But the same was not considered. Hence,