SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Mad) 2095

M.DURAISWAMY
Chandrammal – Appellant
Versus
Jayarama Naicker – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:S. Sadasivam, Advocate. For the Respondent:T.V. Krishnamachari, Advocate.

Judgment :

Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure judgment and decree dated 8. 1999 made in A.S.No.111 of 1998 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Maduranthakam confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 24.09.1997 passed in O.S.No.119 of 1992 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Maduranthakam. The above Second Appeal arises against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.111 of 1998 on the file of Sub Court, Maduranthakam confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.119 of 1992 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Maduranthakam.

2. The plaintiff in the suit is the appellant in the above second appeal. The respondent is the defendant in the suit.

3. The plaintiff filed suit in O.S.No.119 of 1992 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Maduranthaham for declaration and injunction.

.4. The brief case of the plaintiff is as follows:-

.The plaintiff is the absolute and exclusive owner of the suit property measuring an extent on 0.07 cents. She purchased the property under a registered sale deed dated 21. 1982. Since then, she is in absolute possession and enjoyment of the suit property. Originally one Balatherasammals mother and one Innaiya Reddiar p





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top