M.JAICHANDREN
K. Perumal – Appellant
Versus
Joint Director (Valuation) & Others – Respondent
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing for the respondents.
2. The petitioner has stated that his daughter, P.Vinotha, had appeared for the Higher Secondary examinations conducted by the first respondent in the month of March, 2009, with Register No.651149. After valuation of the answer books the results had been declared and the petitioners daughter had scored 1150 out of 1200. In the mark sheet issued by the first respondent, the particulars of the marks obtained by P.Vinotha had been shown as follows:
Theory
Prac
Sanskrit 198
English
175
Physics
139
050
189
Chemistry
144 050
194
Comp.Science 144
050
194
Maths 200
Total
1150
3. It has been further stated that even though the petitioners daughter, P.Vinotha, was expecting 194 marks in the physics paper, she was awarded only 189 marks. Therefore, the petitioner had applied for a copy of the answer book of the physics examination. A xerox copy of the answer book had been given to the petitioner. On consultation with some of the experienced teachers in the subject the petitioner had come to know that his daughter should have got 3 marks for the answer to Question No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.