SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Mad) 2783

G.RAJASURIA
Kalimuthu – Appellant
Versus
Saraswathy & Another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:----For the Respondents:C. Kulanthaivelu, Advocate.

Judgment :-

Animadverting upon the order dated 011. 2006 passed by the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Perundurai in M.C.No.5 of 2005, this criminal revision is focussed.

2. An epitome and the long and short of the relevant facts, which are absolutely necessary for the disposal of this criminal revision could succinctly and precisely be set out thus:

(i) The respondents herein filed M.C.No.5 of 2005 before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Perundurai seeking maintenance as against the revision petitioner under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Inasmuch as the revision petitioner resisted the claim, the enquiry was conducted.

(ii) During enquiry, on the side of the petitioner, the petitioner/wife examined herself as P.W.1 and Exs.P1 to P4 were marked. On the respondents side, R.Ws.1 and 2 were examined and Exs.R1 and R2 were marked.

(iii) Ultimately, the lower court awarded maintenance in a sum of Rs.500/- per month payable by the revision petitioner in favour of each of the respondents herein.

(iv) Challenging and impugning, such awarding of maintenance in favour of the respondents herein, this revision has been filed on various groun



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top