S.PALANIVELU
R. Muruga Perumal – Appellant
Versus
J. Radhamani – Respondent
In the petition the following have been stated:
The petition filed in H.M.O.P.No.131 of 2008 against the respondent/husband for divorce on the ground of cruelty. Out of the lawful wedlock, a female child was born on 30.4.2003 at Kasthuri Hospital, Tambaram, Chennai. The petitioner got admission at R.St.Marys Matriculation School, Nandivaram, Guduvancheri in 2006. The respondent/husband was not present at the time of admission in the school. The petitioner was working as a teacher in that school. On 16.03.2008 the respondent took the child and now she is with the parents of the respondent. The petitioner is willing to educate her in the same school. If she is allowed with the respondent, her life and education will be spoiled. Hence the petitioner is seeking interim custody of the child.
2. In the counter filed by the respondent, it is stated that on 12.03.2008 the petitioner had handed over the child to him by saying that Suwaashas life will be prosperous in future only under the custody of himself and after that she left the family and went to her parents house. Now the child is aged about 6 years, she is going to school regularly. The present petition is not maintain
1. Mary Vanitha v. Babu Royan [1991 (2) MLJ 231]
6. Gaurav Nagpal v. Sumedha Nagpal [(2009) 1 SCC 42]
3. Mausami Moitra Ganguli v. Jayant Ganguli [(2008) 7 SCC 673]
5. Nil Ratan Kundu and another v. Abhijit Kundu [(2008) 9 SCC 413]
2. Asha Varghese v. Leelama Pailo and others [2005 (1) CTC 536]
4. Dhanwanti Joshi v. Madhav Unde [(1998) 1 Supreme Court Cases 112]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.