Challenging and impugning the order dated 210. 2006 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, No.I, Gobichettipalayam, in Crl.M.P.No.4644 of 2006 in C.C.No.34 of 2006, these criminal revision cases are focussed.

2. Compendiously and concisely, the facts which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this case would run thus:-

The police laid the police report in terms of Section 173 of Cr.P.C. for the offence under Sections 354 and 506(i) IPC as against the accused. When the matter has been pending before the Magistrate concerned, the de-facto complainant herself filed a petition for including Sections 498 and 509 of IPC. But the said petition was dismissed. Charges were framed by the Magistrate for the offences under Sections 354 and 506(i) IPC. Thereafter Additional Public Prosecutor concerned filed Crl.M.P.No.4644 of 2006 for framing additional charge under Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of (Harassment of Women) Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) and it was allowed. Being aggrieved by and disconcerted with the order of the Court below in Crl.M.P.No.4644 of 2006, the petitioners/accused have filed these revision petitions, raising vari