SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Mad) 3578

ARUNA JAGADEESAN
Thiraviyam – Appellant
Versus
Mukkayee – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:G. Gomathi Sankar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:J. Padmavathi Devi, Advocate.

Judgment :-

This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the plaintiff against the order dated 7. 2009 in IA.No.265/2008 in OS.No.15/2003 passed by the District Munsif Court Cum Judicial Magistrate, Kamudhi, rejecting the petition for amendment.

2. The petitioner/plaintiff had filed the above said suit for declaration and recovery of possession against the respondent/ defendant and the same was dismissed, as against which the petitioner filed an appeal in AS.No.73/2006 on the file of the Sub Court, Paramakudi and the lower appellate court remanded the suit for fresh disposal. Pending the suit, the petitioner has filed the said application for amendment to correct the description of four boundaries and also the nature of the shed put up by him in the suit property.

2. According to the petitioner, he has failed to give the predecessors name of the parties, who are residing/having land on four boundaries and moreover, the shed situated in the suit property is described as “Xl;L bfhl;lif“ instead of “Xl;L tPL“. Therefore, it has become necessary on his part to amend the four boundaries and the nature of the shed suitably.

3. The trial court after discussing the facts of the case, reproduc





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top