SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Mad) 3846

ARUNA JAGADEESAN
S. Gunaseelan – Appellant
Versus
C. Valarmathi & Others – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Natarajan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:V.K. Vijaya Raghavan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

This Civil Revision Petition is filed to strike off and to reject the plaint in OS.No.98/2008 on the file of the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Andipatti.

2. The brief facts, which are essential for the disposal of this Civil Revision Petition, are as follows:-

The suit has been filed by the 1st respondent/ plaintiff against the petitioner and the respondents 2 and 3 for declaration of her title and for consequential relief of injunction. The suit schedule property is described as S.No.892/2 4 acres 80 cents situated at Sanmugasundrapuram Village. The 2nd respondent/2nd defendant is the daughter of the petitioner/1st defendant and the 3rd respondent/3rd defendant is the power agent of the 2nd respondent. The 1st respondent has traced her title to the suit lands on the basis of the sale deed executed in favour of one Rasu Thevar by one Thayammal and the 1st respondent has also referred to the earlier litigation in OS.No.354/1961, As.No.144/1962 and SA.No.1023/1964.

3. The said Thayammal is the original owner of an extent of 6.20 acres in S.No.892, 2.77 Acres in S.No.880 and 1.57 acres in S.No.881 of Sanmugasundarapuram Village, Andipatti Taluk. She has e






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top