This criminal revision case has been filed by the de-facto complainant, who was examined as P.W.1 in the trial court, against the judgment of acquittal pronounced by the Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram, Coimbatore in S.C.No.102/2005 on the file of the said court acquitting the respondents 1 to 7 herein (A1 to A7) in respect of the offences under Sections 498-A, 304-B and 306 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, for which they were prosecuted.

2. The facts leading to the filing of the present criminal revision case, can be briefly stated as follows:-

i) The first respondent (A1) is the husband of the deceased Kausalya. Second respondent (A2) is the mother of the first respondent. Third and fourth respondents (A3 and A4) are the sisters of the first respondent. R5 and R6 are the husband of R3 and R4 respectively. R7-Kuppammal (A7) is the grandmother of the first respondent.

ii) The marriage between the first respondent and Kausalya (deceased) was solemnised according to Hindu rites and customs on 23.05.2002 at Marundeeswarar Temple, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai. The matrimonial life of the first respondent and the deceased Kausalya was not happy, which lead to the