The order of the second respondent in proceedings Na.Ka.No.11878/01/Pa.tho dated 212. 2006 has been called in question and seeking to quash the same, the present writ petition is filed.

2. (a) The petitioner is working as Junior Assistant in the Office of the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Society, Cheyyar Circle. It is the case of the petitioner that based on some false set of facts, the disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him by the third respondent and a charge-memo was issued in proceedings dated 30.7.1998.

(b) The first charge is that the petitioner had taken a xerox copy of the proceedings sent by the Joint Registrar to the Deputy Registrar in Proceedings No.13638/98/Pa.Tho., dated 30.6.1998 and filed the same before the Tribunal in O.A.No.5647/1998 and the second charge is that he has not performed his duty in time. As the petitioner has denied the charges, an enquiry was conducted and an enquiry report was submitted to the second respondent, based on which a final order has been passed in Proceedings dated 25. 2000 imposing the punishment of "Censure". According to the petitioner, in fact, the enquiry officer held that the charges were not proved ag