2009 Supreme(Mad) 5682
High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. JEYAPAUL
P.S.Venkatajan
Versus
C.Devan
S.A.No.193 of 1998
Decided on : 18-12-2009
For the Appellant:Mr.S.Parthasarathy. For the Respondent:Mr.G.Vasudevan, Advocates.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the exemption under Section 30(i) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1960 applies to a newly constructed building for a period of 5 years from the date of completion and notification to the local authority. The failure to notify the local authority should not prevent the plaintiff from claiming exemption if the suit was filed within 5 years from the date of completion of the construction.
Headnote:
Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act - Exemption of new building under Section 30(i) - 30(i) - The court held that the plaintiff is exempted from the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1960, as the suit building was constructed within 5 years from the date of completion and the local authority was duly informed of the new construction.
Fact of the Case:
The plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of possession from the defendant, who was the tenant under him. The defendant resisted the claim on the ground of entitlement to the benefits of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1960.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the plaintiff was exempted from the Act as the suit building was constructed within 5 years from the date of completion and the local authority was duly informed of the new construction. The Court set aside the judgments of the lower courts and directed the Trial Court to complete the trial within two months.
Issues: The main issue was whether the suit building was exempted under Section 30(i) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, despite the defendant's admission that the building was constructed within 5 years from the date of completion.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the exemption under Section 30(i) of the Act applies to a newly constructed building for a period of 5 years from the date of completion and notification to the local authority. The Court emphasized that once the plaintiff could establish with material evidence that the suit was filed within 5 years from the date of completion of the construction, the failure to notify the local authority should not shut out the plaintiff from claiming exemption.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the Trial Court was directed to complete the trial within two months.
The unsuccessful plaintiff before both the Courts below, is the appellant herein.
2. The plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of possession from the defendant, who is admittedly the tenant under him.
3. The plaintiff having contended that the defendant, who was the tenant under the vendor of the plaintiff vacated the suit property enabling the plaintiff to put up a new construction and thereafter occupied the suit property on completion of the new construction, as on 14.04.1991 laid the suit for the aforesaid relief, after issuing statutory notice to the defendant to vacate the premises.
4. The defendant resisted the claim of the plaintiff on the ground that he was entitled to the benefits of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1960. Having admitted that a new construction was put up by the plaintiff and he was inducted into half of the ground floor measuring 54" feet X 11-1/2" feet under the rent deed dated 14.04.1991, the defendant contended that his established business would be ruined if he vacated from the suit premises.
5. The Trial Court having framed seven issues, based on the rival pleadings of the parties, took up the first issue as to whether the defendant was entitled to the benefits of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1960, on the basis of the request emanated from both the parties and decided the same in favour of the defendant.
6. There was no oral evidence let in on either side, but on the side of the plaintiff eight documents were marked before the Trial Court.
7. The Trial Court adverting to the provisions Under Section 30(i) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1960 has held that inasmuch as the plaintiff failed to notify to the local authority concerned about the completion of construction of the building, the plaintiff cannot seek exemption from the application of the aforesaid Act.
8. TheFirst Appellate Court having marked two additional documents as Exs.A9 and A10, the sanctioned plan and the tax receipt respectively, confirmed the Judgment of the Trial Court with respect to the preliminary issue framed and answered by the Trial Court.
9. The following substantial question of law was formulated at the time of the admission of the second appeal.
1) Whether the Courts below are right in holding that the suit building is not exempted under 30(i) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, despite the admission of the defendant that the building is constructed in the year 1991, i.e. Within a span of five years, the suit has been filed.
10. The learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant/plaintiff would submit that just because the local authority was not notified of the completion of the construction of the building, the exemption granted Under Section 30 (i) cannot be taken away. It is his further submission that in the instant case, the defendant categorically admits that only in the year 1991, a new construction was put up by the plaintiff and immediately thereafter, he was inducted into possession of the property as per the rent deed dated 14.04.1991. The Courts below have failed to take into consideration the admitted position of the parties, he argues.
11. Per Contra, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/defendant would submit that Section 30(i) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1960 mandates that the new construction of the building should be notified to the local authority concerned. The period of five years cannot be calculated from the date of completion of the construction unless it was notified to the local authority to seek exemption Under Section 30(i) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1960.
12. Section 30 (i) reads as follows:
30. Exemption in the case of certain buildings-Nothing contained in this Act shall apply to-
[(i) any building for a period of five years from the date on which the construction is completed and notified to the local au