PRABHA SRIDEVAN, M.SATHYANARAYANAN
Cholamandalam DBS Finance Ltd. , Rep. by its Assistant Manager Legal, K. Venkateswaran – Appellant
Versus
Sudheesh Kumar – Respondent
This appeal has been filed against the order of the learned single Judge directing the appellant to hand over to the respondent the vehicle, viz., Chevrolet Tavera BS III bearing Registration No.KL-43-2829 with Engine No.31F42786 and Chassis No.MA6AB6G766HJ42343.
2.The appellant-company and the respondent-borrower entered into a loan agreement in respect of the above vehicle. The agreement provided for the resolution of dispute by arbitration. Article 11 of the agreement provides for re-possession by the company of the Asset of the company, as the vehicle is called, on occurrence of any of the events of default set out in Article 10 of the agreement and if the borrower failed to deliver the Asset, it was open to the company to enter any place where the Asset may be and to remove or take possession of the same.
3.The appellant filed Application No.1282 of 2009 for appointment of an advocate commissioner to seize and deliver the aforesaid vehicle. According to them, the respondent was due and payable a total sum of Rs.5,87,796/- under the agreement. The said amount should be paid in 36 monthly instalments. It is also alleged that there was chronic and wilful default and a
1993-I-MLJ-284 (Paramasivam v. The T.N. Indl. Invt. Corpn. Ltd.)
M/s.Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. M/s.NEPC India Ltd. (A.I.R. 1999 SC 564)
(2007) 7 SCC 125 (Adhunik Steels Ltd. v. Orissa Manganese and Minerals (P) Ltd.)
(2004) 3 SCC 155 (Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.