SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Mad) 676

A.SELVAM
Ranjith Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Sivasubramanian – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :A.R.M. Ramesh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:R. Vijayakumar, Advocate.

Judgment :

1. Challenge in this second appeal is to the Judgment and decree dated 08.09.1995 passed in Appeal Suit No.117 of 1991 by the Sub Court, Tuticorin.

2. The respondent herein as plaintiff has instituted Original Suit No.710 of 1997 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Tuticorin for the reliefs of declaration and perpetual injunction, wherein the present appellant has been shown as defendant.

3. It is averred in the plaint that the plaintiff has purchased the suit property under a registered sale deed dated 24.02.1983 from one Paul Thangaraj and he purchased the same under a registered sale deed dated 10. 1962 and his predecessor-in-title has purchased the same under a registered sale deed dated 111. 1952. The Government has granted patta for the suit property. From the date of purchase, the plaintiff has been in possession and enjoyment of the same. The defendant is the eastern owner of the property and since she tried to disturb the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit property by way of denying his title, the present suit has been instituted for the reliefs sought for in the plaint.

4. In the written statement filed on the sid

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top