SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Mad) 1719

S.PALANIVELU
M. Padma – Appellant
Versus
V. Veeramani – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:S.S. Sundar, Advocate. For the Respondent:S. Venkatakrishnan, Advocate.

Judgment :

Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal No. 25 of 2006 is filed challenging the order and decree dated 4. 2006 made in H.M.C.M.A. No. 53 of 2005 on the file of I Addl. District Court, Tirunelveli reversing the order and decree dated 29. 2005 made in H.M.O.P. No. 66 of 2003 on the file of I Addl. Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli.

2. Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal No. 26 of 2006 is filed challenging the order and decree dated 4. 2006 made in H.M.C.M.A. No. 54 of 2005 on the file of I Addl. District Court, Tirunelveli reversing the order and decree dated 29. 2005 made in H.M.O.P. No. 72 of 2003 on the file of I Addl. Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli.

3. The following are the allegations contained in the petition in H.M.O.P. No. 66 of 2003 by the respondent under Section 13 (ia) and (i)(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act 25 of 1965.

3(a) The marriage of both the parties was solemnized as per the Hindu rites on 28. 1987 at Meenakshi Chokkanathar Temple at Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District the receiption was held on 20.8.1987 at Somasundariammal Trust Kalyana Mandapam at Palayamkottai. During their living in Tamil Nadu Housing Board Colony, Maharaja Nagar, the wife’s attitude towards th



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top