SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Mad) 1794

C.S.KARNAN
Ponnusamy – Appellant
Versus
Sulochana & Another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Sounthar, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R1, P. Valliappan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

The civil revision petitioner herein is the applicant/third party in E.A.No.151 of 2007, in E.P.No.56 of 2004, in O.S.No.188 of 2003, on the file of the Sub-Court, Kallakurichi. The civil revision petitioner has filed an execution application in E.A.No.157 of 2007, praying to set aside the Court auction dated 18.04.2007, conducted in E.P.No.56 of 2004, in O.S.No.188 of 2003. The same was dismissed on 25.08.2008. Against this order, the revision has been filed.

2. The revision petitioner/third party applicant has inter-alia stated that the first respondent has filed a suit in O.S.No.188 of 2003 against the second respondent for recovery of money. The same was decreed on 211. 2003. Pursuant to the decree, the first respondent has filed E.P.No.56 of 2004 for attachment of nine items of immovable properties of the second respondent. Out of these nine items of properties, the eighth item of property has been purchased by the first respondent in the Court auction after obtaining permission from the Court. But, so far, the said auction had not been confirmed by the Court.

.3. The revision petitioner has further stated that he had filed a suit in O.S.No.681 of 2002 against the





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top