N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR, VASANTHAKUMAR
Subhiksha Trading Services Ltd, Rep by its Company Secretary – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Police, Chennai & Others – Respondent
The prayer in the writ petition is to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take action against the respondents 3 to 6 on the basis of the complaint/representation submitted by the petitioner dated 2. 2010.
2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is a Company doing retail trading services in respect of FMCGS and has a large number of outlets all over India and it is providing goods at discounted price by the process of direct marketing by obviating the role of middlemen. After September, 2008, the Company expanded rapidly with 1600 outlets and ran into deep financial crunch and for restructuring the Company by closing certain branches, necessary schemes have been placed under the provisions of Section 391 Companies Act, 1956, before this Court and the said company petition is pending.
3. The 6th respondent filed an eviction petition in R.C.O.P.No.4 of 2009 seeking eviction in respect of a non-residential premises at Door No.155 Medavakkam Main Road, Keelkattalai, Chennai-117. The 6th respondent and two others (namely the wife and mother of the 6th respondent) received a refundable security deposit of Rs.1.50 lakhs from the petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.